Yeah same thing, that code was super popular once as I know. I ended up ask chat gpt for the code but it didn’t work so I also looked at the code and found it a little different.
I figured out what the hint was, and the hint told me to cheat. So I cheated and looked at the code, but I then said to myself, “Wait… is this cheating and the hint that said “cheater” did not mean I should cheat?” If that if that were true, then I would be a cheater myself, since I looked at the code. But if I was supposed to cheat, then I would not be a cheater, but I still would be a cheater because I looked at the code, but @Josef said to not look at the code, also making me a cheater, unless the hint was to cheat, meaning I should’ve cheated, and since I did I was a cheater but not at the same time. This could also mean I cheated the system, making me a double cheater. But if I cheated the way I cheated the cheat I used to cheat the system I would be a cheater of the double cheated system, making me a cheater that has cheated the cheated cheater system that has been double cheated and now triple cheated because I just cheated the double cheated cheater system again, making the double cheated cheater system and the triple cheater cheated cheater system, which was now most likely cheated by someone else, making them a double cheated cheater of the cheated cheater system. Also, if I were to say, “I will not not do this,” since I said “not” twice, it would cancel out, making it a “yes”, which means if I called myself a double cheated cheater of the triple cheated cheater system that cheated the cheater’s cheated cheated system, that would make me not a cheater, meaning I must have played the gameright and not have cheated the triple cheated cheater double cheated cheater system of cheated cheaters that cheated the double cheated cheater of the triple cheater cheated system.